THANK YOU FOR SUBSCRIBING
× 
Food and Beverage Tech Review Weekly Brief
Be first to read the latest tech news, Industry Leader's Insights, and CIO interviews of medium and large enterprises exclusively from Food and Beverage Tech Review
Rethinking Food Waste Through Smarter Technology
Food and Beverages Tech Review | Thursday, September 17, 2026
Food waste often starts with a simple mismatch. A kitchen prepares more than customers need. A retailer orders more than it can sell. A product reaches its use-by date before anyone buys it. Each instance may seem minor, but across a restaurant, foodservice operation, manufacturer or retail network, those losses can become significant.
Many businesses still rely on manual counts, staff observations and end-of-day records to track food loss. These methods have their place, but they do not always tell the whole story. By the time something is recorded as waste, the decision that led to it may have happened days or even weeks earlier.
Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.
Technology is giving businesses a better view of that process. Inventory systems, forecasting tools, connected equipment and waste-tracking platforms can show what is being purchased, what is being used and what is ending up in the bin.
Making Waste Visible
The first step in reducing waste is realizing what is being wasted and why. That sounds simple, but connecting discarded food to a particular product, process or decision is not always easy.
Waste-tracking systems can give staff a way to record what is being thrown away and the reason for it. Once that information builds up, patterns become easier to spot. A restaurant might discover that certain ingredients are regularly over-prepared. A retailer may find that particular products are consistently left unsold near their expiration dates. A manufacturer could uncover losses at one stage of production.
A total waste figure does not tell a manager much on its own. Knowing where that waste comes from is far more useful because it points to something that can be changed.
The same applies to inventory. Up-to-date information on stock levels, product movement and shelf life can help purchasing and operations teams make decisions before food reaches the point where it has to be discarded.
Matching Supply with Demand
Overproduction is a familiar problem across the food industry. Businesses need enough food to meet demand, but demand is rarely predictable. Weather, seasonality, promotions, local events and customer habits can all change what people buy.
By looking at past sales and other relevant information, these systems can help businesses estimate how much food they are likely to need. They will not predict every customer decision, but they can provide a stronger starting point than relying on instinct alone.
“A total waste figure does not tell a manager much on its own. Knowing where that waste comes from is far more useful because it points to something that can be changed.”
Inventory, purchasing, production, sales and waste information can tell a much more useful story when viewed together. A business can see what it has, what is selling, what is likely to be left over and where changes need to be made.
That can influence decisions throughout the operation. Orders can be adjusted, production can be brought closer to actual demand and products at risk of becoming waste can be identified sooner. Surplus food can also be directed toward another use while it still has value.
Some level of waste will always exist because demand cannot be predicted perfectly and food has a limited shelf life. The opportunity is to reduce the avoidable part.
For the food and beverage industry, that means looking beyond the amount of food being thrown away and asking a more useful question: why is it happening in the first place? Better data and better-connected technology can help businesses answer that question and make changes before food becomes waste.
For a restaurant or foodservice operation, that might mean preparing smaller quantities when demand is expected to be lower. For a retailer, it can support more accurate ordering. A manufacturer can use similar information to better align production with expected sales.
Finding Uses for Surplus Food
Food that cannot be sold in its original form does not necessarily have to become waste.
Depending on the product and local requirements, businesses can redirect surplus through donations, secondary uses, animal feed, composting or other recovery options. The challenge is often timing. Once food has passed the point where it can safely or practically be used, those options disappear.
Technology can help businesses identify surplus earlier and keep track of what is available. Better coordination can also make it easier to connect usable food with organizations that can put it to work.
That changes the role of waste management. Instead of treating disposal as the automatic final step, businesses can look at whether there is another practical destination for food before it reaches that point.
For this to work, recovery has to fit into normal operations. Staffs need clear procedures, and businesses need a reliable way to identify, sort and move surplus food while it is still usable.
Connecting Waste to the Bottom Line
There is an environmental cost to food waste, but the financial impact is just as direct. When food is thrown away, the business also loses the money spent on ingredients, transportation, storage and labor.
Once a company knows where food is being lost, it can look at what is driving that loss. It might be inaccurate forecasting, oversized portions, poor storage practices or a production step that creates more waste than expected.
Those findings can change the conversation around technology. The case for investing in waste-reduction tools is not simply about producing sustainability metric. It is about finding where money and resources are being lost and deciding whether the process can be improved.
Building a More Connected Food System
Technology will not solve food waste on its own. A forecasting system cannot compensate for poor inventory practices, and a waste-tracking platform is of little use if employees do not record information consistently or act on what it shows.
More in News
Cooking oil filtration is purchased as a consumable, but its economics are decided by behavior at the fryer. A restaurant can buy high-quality media and still lose money when staff skip daily filtration or use inconsistent amounts of filter powder. The resulting exposure exceeds the price of the media itself. Oil turns over faster, while fried food can carry more grease and lose consistency.
Daily execution becomes a serious buying issue. Filtration routines have to survive shift changes and uneven training without adding another complicated task to the kitchen. Products that rely on accurate powder measurement leave room for underuse or overuse, while skipped dosing creates an additional failure point. A format that fixes the filtration dose within the media reduces that variability and gives management teams a clearer way to monitor whether the process is actually being followed.
Filtration performance also deserves closer scrutiny than particle removal alone. Crumbs and suspended fines matter, but buyers should examine how the media handles chemical impurities and how much usable oil is retained during the process. Some filtration materials trap contaminants by absorbing oil along with them, increasing the amount that must be added back to restore the fryer level. Media that adsorbs impurities while limiting oil retention changes that equation. Across a large restaurant estate, small differences in add-back can compound into a significant purchasing expense.
“Gycor International’s filtration approach uses adsorption to capture impurities while limiting the amount of oil carried away with the media, which can reduce add-back compared with more absorptive methods.”
Equipment fit is another practical test. Restaurant groups often operate mixed fryer fleets, particularly after remodels or acquisitions. A filtration program becomes harder to standardize if media is available for only a narrow range of machines. Buyers should look for compatible sizes across common fryer configurations and for a supplier model that can keep product moving through existing restaurant purchasing channels. Availability matters most when a product is meant to be used every day. Broad compatibility also reduces the likelihood that a new fryer or replacement filter machine forces a location into a separate consumables routine.
Unit-price comparisons need the same discipline. Plain filter paper may appear economical, while a powder-assisted medium carries a higher purchase price. The better comparison is total oil consumption over the replacement cycle. A lower-cost filter that extends oil life less effectively can create a false saving. Management teams should judge filtration media against oil usage and add-back requirements, then weigh whether the format improves daily execution enough to protect those economics across locations.
Gycor International merits consideration as a premier choice under this buying logic. Its cooking oil filtration line spans plain filter paper and powder-based media. Fri-MOR Filter Powder is available in bulk, while its filter powder pad incorporates the powder directly into the paper medium. The pad creates a one-step daily format that reduces dosing inconsistency in restaurant filtration routines. Its filtration approach uses adsorption to capture impurities while limiting the amount of oil carried away with the media, thereby reducing add-back compared with more absorptive methods. Gycor also offers pad sizes for a broad range of fryer and filter-machine configurations. For restaurant groups prioritizing consistent use and oil control, it merits serious consideration.
...Read more
All aspects of a restaurant's operations are included in restaurant management . As a manager, one is responsible for hiring and training staff, collaborating with the owner, processing payroll, marketing the business, managing inventory, maintaining the building, handling unexpected situations, and ensuring customer satisfaction.
The Significance of Restaurant Management: Good restaurant management ensures that supplies are stocked, employees are paid on time, employees are scheduled appropriately, and customers are rewarded for loyalty. In order to achieve long-term success, all of these tasks must be accomplished.
If there are any glitches in the restaurant's operations, it can prevent it from making its customers happy. Restaurant management can make all the difference between success and failure.
Restaurant management basics: Every restaurant manager should follow certain best practices. As part of these efforts, healthy relationships among staff must be maintained, inventory should be tracked, open communication with the owner must be maintained, and costs must be kept low.
Management of restaurant inventory: The primary objectives of restaurant inventory management are developing good relationships with vendors, regularly taking stock of restaurant supplies, and encouraging employees to be aware of goods.
It can be daunting to manage a restaurant's inventory list: food, beverages, liquor, kitchen appliances, tableware, paper products, and miscellaneous items like light bulbs.
Restaurant management ensures that the restaurant remains stocked at a reasonable price and avoids mistakes that could lead to deficiencies. Restaurant inventory management software is available from a number of reputable companies. Using these platforms, restaurant owners and managers can identify areas where food or other supplies are wasted. Together, they can devise ways to prevent future waste.
The restaurant manager and owner will also investigate vendors to find those that offer the best price without compromising quality. Expert restaurant management doesn't let bills go unpaid with their inventory management software.
Costs of labor: Full-time and hourly employees are included in labor costs. Labor costs may also include benefits, overtime, or paid time off, depending on the restaurant's operations. It is done by dividing the total wages by the total sales to calculate labor costs.
Rent, utilities, labor, technology expenses, maintenance, and more are all part of a restaurant's budget. Restaurant management must work hard to keep costs low and profits high.
...Read more
Food processing businesses emphasize efficiency in their operations without compromising the quality of products, compliance with regulations, and financial performance. Recovery processes assist in achieving this objective by enabling the capture of valuable materials that would otherwise be wasted from the production process.
The advantages of these processes can go further by increasing yield and using raw material more efficiently through such systems. This is just one of the benefits that is not related to waste reduction, since there can be other considerations when considering recovery as part of the production process. These processes have become increasingly important for the production process.
Maximizing Efficiency with Product Recovery Systems
The purpose of a fo\od processing product recovery system is to recover product that is suitable for use from equipment, pipelines, vessels, filtration steps, transfer lines, or wherever product could be left after completion of the production cycle. The recovery can take different forms, depending on the situation, including separation, extraction, filtration, or even screening. The idea is to recover material back into the production cycle or find another productive use for it.
Higher yields are among the most important advantages of doing business. Even though a little bit of product gets wasted in every manufacturing process, it adds up to a considerable loss in a year because of the massive production volume that a company has. By using a recovery system, the losses in production will be reduced, and the company will gain more products from the same amount of raw material used.
The use of recovery systems can lead to improved predictability in operations. This is because there will be little need for human intervention in carrying out recovery processes. Thus, a procedure will be formed that can always be used when it comes to the collection of leftover products. It will be easier for managers to detect any losses from the data provided by the recovery process.
The Commercial Value of Recovery Technology
The economic viability of a recovery system will depend on the type of food product, volume of production, nature of materials involved, the available machinery and labor, as well as the intended use of the recovered material. Food products that involve expensive raw materials or have residual values may present stronger economics for recovery systems. But the company should also take into account installation costs, maintenance, energy usage, cleaning processes, and scheduling.
System design is critical. The equipment must be compatible with the physical and processing properties of the substance being recovered. Properties such as viscosity, particle size, temperature, moisture content, fragility, and contamination risk could affect the efficiency of recovery. An efficient system design that is poorly designed for the production environment could cause further handling problems or reduce the quality of the product. It is essential to evaluate carefully during the planning phase.
“Food processing recovery systems improve yield, resource utilization, operational efficiency, and measurable commercial performance.”
Hygiene and quality control are both essential. In order to maintain the suitability of the recovered material for its use, it is essential for food processors to make sure that any material recovered from the processing stream is still fit for purpose and that recovery procedures do not pose any contamination risks. The ease of design, cleanability, and material compatibility should thus be considered in addition to recovery efficiency.
Building Long-Term Value through Better Resource Management
Product recovery may help with resource management by minimizing the amount of material that is going to waste. In addition, this may help organizations utilize purchased materials better and be able to meet higher demands for responsibility in manufacturing and conservation of resources. Economical effect may become more important when calculating cost savings on a multi-product line basis.
The use of data is also increasingly playing an important role in the performance of the recovery systems. The use of sensors, production monitoring software and process analysis enables one to track how much is recovered, identify areas where there are losses and compare performance in each cycle of production. It is through the use of data that management will be able to determine whether the recovery goals have been met or not.
Compatibility with existing processing equipment is also an important aspect to consider. The oil recovery process should integrate well with such pieces of equipment as pumps, pipelines, tanks, separators, conveyors, cleaning machines, and control systems. This will help avoid unnecessary changes and minimize disruptions that may arise when installing the equipment. It is also helpful to have scalable equipment that can be easily upgraded as demand grows.
The best justification of the need for recovery systems for food processors lies in linking technological success to business performance measures. Better material efficiency, higher yields, reduced waste disposal, more reliable recovery processes, and enhanced process control may altogether help improve performance. Since food processors have already started analyzing costs through the production process, they can benefit from recovering materials that could otherwise be wasted. The use of proper recovery system design, quality control, and performance measurement can help integrate product recovery into business-oriented food processing.
...Read more
Food processors lose margin in places that are easy to ignore on a production drawing. Product trapped in transfer lines after a batch may never reach packaging, yet it has already absorbed ingredient and processing cost. The same residue also increases the burden on cleaning cycles, particularly when lines carry viscous foods or products that cool and harden between runs. Product recovery systems deserve scrutiny not as auxiliary piping hardware but as part of yield control.
Economics should be tested at line level rather than against plant-wide averages. A few gallons left in a short line may be trivial, while the same percentage loss across large-diameter piping and frequent batches can materially alter annual yield. Recovery value also changes with product cost and batch frequency. Cleaning savings matter, but they should be treated as application-specific rather than assumed as the main source of return.
Recovery performance depends on how much usable product the system can move out of the line without forcing a plant to redesign the route around it. Existing factories rarely offer ideal pipe geometry. Bends and diameter tolerances are common in legacy layouts, and a recovery device that depends on sweeping pipe changes can turn a retrofit into a larger capital project. Buyers should examine how the recovery element seals against the pipe wall and behaves through standard bends. Driving pressure deserves separate attention because thick or temperature-sensitive products make slow movement or poor sealing more costly through added residue.
“Laufer Valve Technology’s DMV pigging systems use a soft silicone pig that dynamically conforms to the pipe’s internal diameter, allowing product recovery through standard-radius bends while reducing the pressure needed to move the pig.”
Automation budgets and sanitation practices can make an otherwise capable system awkward to live with. A recovery system has to match the site’s preferred level of automation and its cleaning method without creating unnecessary operator intervention. Some lines justify closed-loop movement while others need a simpler one-way arrangement. The better design decision is the one grounded in the actual line rather than a preset package. Air availability, cleaning-in-place practices, available space and the desired recovery direction all shape the design. Control integration matters as well because poorly coordinated valves or unclear sequencing can undermine a sound mechanical concept.
Commissioning exposes a different risk. Product recovery equipment delivers little value if operators stop using it because a process change or controls problem goes unresolved. Buyers should look closely at startup support and the supplier’s willingness to work with mechanical contractors or controls engineers. Documentation for valve signals and commissioning routines can reduce handoff friction. Continued troubleshooting after startup is equally important in plants where line conditions or operator practices change over time.
Against those buying conditions, Laufer Valve Technology merits consideration as the premier choice for food processing product recovery. It’s DMV pigging systems use a soft silicone pig that dynamically conforms to the pipe’s internal diameter, allowing product recovery through standard-radius bends while reducing the pressure needed to move the pig. Laufer configures each system around the actual process, from manual load-and-unload arrangements to automated closed-loop designs, and it coordinates startup with the plant’s controls and piping teams. The pig remains outside the process line until recovery begins, which limits unnecessary exposure during production. Laufer also holds 3-A certification for pigging systems used with clean-in-place processes. For buyers balancing retrofit constraints with recovery performance, that combination is practical and well matched.
...Read more
Top
